Welcome to the DAD.Info forum: We are not open to new posts at this time
Our forum aims to provide support and guidance where it can, however we may not always have the answer. The forum is not moderated 24 hours a day, so If you – or someone you know – are being harmed or in immediate danger of being harmed, call the police on 999.
Alternatively, if you are in crisis, please call Samaritans on 116 123.
If you are worried about you or someone you know is at risk of harm, please click here: How we can help
Hi guys,
Acrimonious separation, not married, 2 primary school aged children, pay full child maintainance. Sold my solely owned / maintained house and now ex wants a lump sum from it.
I owe her £20k separately, which she refuses to take and is pleading poverty even though court order states she is able to need the needs of the children.
She has threatened using the children’s act section 1 to claim some money Even though she refuses to accept what she is already owed. I am a slightly above average earner and by no means wealthy.
Anybody any experience of defending a claim like this?
Hi,
if you have already been through courts to sort these issues out, I think you don't need to worry. A common reason a parent would use schedule 1 act to apply for financial provision for children, would be if they want you to contribute to child's university/private tuition fees in future for example.
@bill337 thanks for the reply. To clarify, I took her to court for child access. She tried bringing up finance but the magistrates didn’t entertain it. So ex has threatened to apply herself under section 1.
@opti123 she can try. if your not already paying child maintenance through CMS, they will likely tell her to apply to CMS.
@bill337 I pay CMS. Plus she refuses to accept her £20k so would hope the courts would class that as a first port of call. Thanks for your info!
- Samaritans – call 116 123
- Shout – text the word ‘Shout’ to 85258
