Welcome to the DAD.Info forum: We are not open to new posts at this time
Our forum aims to provide support and guidance where it can, however we may not always have the answer. The forum is not moderated 24 hours a day, so If you – or someone you know – are being harmed or in immediate danger of being harmed, call the police on 999.
Alternatively, if you are in crisis, please call Samaritans on 116 123.
If you are worried about you or someone you know is at risk of harm, please click here: How we can help
Hi,
I have put in a C2 application to court to re-open a previous judgment based in a new fact i.e. a recording of mother clearly stating something very contradictory to an event that happened.
After I put in my C2 application to have a "specifics issue order" and the judge refused my application, just saying he is not going to deal with it.
1. What is the best way for a judge to actually hear this application as C2’s aren’t being heard.
2. Is the judge wrong to not allow this evidence / my C2 application and therefore can I appeal this specific issue i.e. just this point and not the other points as this application is separate as termed “specific issue order”
Thankfully, my other applications and contact is going forward, but to be honest, the specific issue has been a real thorn that mother keeps using, this way I can just silence her and favorable with the judge and clearing my name once and for all.
Hi,
When were you last in court?
Generally Judges would only accept applications if there has been some change in circumstances. Do you mind giving general reason why you made another application?
@bill337 I stated above, the reason why I wanted to do the C2 was to re-open a previous finding of fact based on new evidence which I am putting in.
- Samaritans – call 116 123
- Shout – text the word ‘Shout’ to 85258
