Welcome to the DAD.Info forum: We are not open to new posts at this time
Our forum aims to provide support and guidance where it can, however we may not always have the answer. The forum is not moderated 24 hours a day, so If you – or someone you know – are being harmed or in immediate danger of being harmed, call the police on 999.
Alternatively, if you are in crisis, please call Samaritans on 116 123.
If you are worried about you or someone you know is at risk of harm, please click here: How we can help
Since 2005, access and maintenance has been agreed privately between my ex-wife and myself. My son is now 11 years old and has his own views on how he wants to spend his time. I have tried to be as flexible as possible and accommodate what he wants even if it means I have been unable to have him overnight when I am supposed. As a result of this, the number of overnight stays he has with me has reduced. My ex-wife has now told me that she has gone to the CSA to claim more money based on the number of overnight stays he has with me, even though it is not me who has changed the original private agreement. Surely she cannot have it every which way?
I am unsure what to do. I cannot afford to pay more than I do already and if I try to force my son to stay overnight when he is supposed to in order to see him and maintain the current level of maintenance payment, I run the risk of him becoming resentful towards me.
What view will the CSA take of the situation? Is it as clear-cut as no. of overnight stays even though the reduction has been lead by my ex-wife/son and not myself?
- Samaritans – call 116 123
- Shout – text the word ‘Shout’ to 85258


