Welcome to the DAD.Info forum: We are not open to new posts at this time
Our forum aims to provide support and guidance where it can, however we may not always have the answer. The forum is not moderated 24 hours a day, so If you – or someone you know – are being harmed or in immediate danger of being harmed, call the police on 999.
Alternatively, if you are in crisis, please call Samaritans on 116 123.
If you are worried about you or someone you know is at risk of harm, please click here: How we can help
I have been battling with my ex for some years over maintenance. Over the last 2 years, the CSA have been trying to enforce a DMD (default maintenance decision) which basically means she has to pay £40 per week. However, recently, using proof from a tax return, the CSA accepted that she has had no income for the last 2 years and therefore owes nothing at all - since she isn't on benefits, she doesn't even need to pay the normal minimum of £5 per week (which is what she has been paying until now). Since she has normal bills to pay, including a mortgage - it is obvious that she has income from somewhere, and I suspect that some creative accounting means she has no taxable income, but still gives her money from somewhere.
I am looking at a CSA variation on the basis of Lifestyle inconsistent with income, though I have no proof of income, so it's an uphill battle.
Does anyone know if, on the basis that the maintenance level set by the CSA is insufficient (obviously), whether I can then apply to court for a Maintenance Order?
- Samaritans – call 116 123
- Shout – text the word ‘Shout’ to 85258


