Welcome to the DAD.Info forum: We are not open to new posts at this time
Our forum aims to provide support and guidance where it can, however we may not always have the answer. The forum is not moderated 24 hours a day, so If you – or someone you know – are being harmed or in immediate danger of being harmed, call the police on 999.
Alternatively, if you are in crisis, please call Samaritans on 116 123.
If you are worried about you or someone you know is at risk of harm, please click here: How we can help
2 judges and CAFCASS have agreed that I'm sane & safe & awarded me overnight contact (to start in 3 months). At the moment I get 3 hours every 2 weeks unsupervised.
My ex didn't want me to have unsupervised contact at all as "our son needs his mum at all times".
My ex has now gone to her 3rd or 4th law firm (all under legal aid) to contest the contact order saying that our son is "too young to enjoy overnight contact" and he would be "distressed if he's away from his mum".
2 judges and CAFCASS have expressed their opinions in court in my favour at the "reasons" that my wife objects access. Their opinions were that our son would benefit from contact with me and they see no legal or moral objection to refuse access.
In the times I've been able to see our son without the ex present, he hasn't cried at all & generally has a smile on his face when I'm around.
I believe, as does my solicitor, that since I pay for Legal costs & the ex doesn't, that my ex is trying to simply cost me more money that I can ill afford with the aim of pushing me into excessive debt or having to give up my access.
How many times can we go through court, with no new reason for objection?
If it just get thrown out of court, then I've still got to pay legal fees as, being disabled but working, I'm not eligable for Legal Aid. By the time the next court appearance has finished, I will have run up £10k+ in fees.
- Samaritans – call 116 123
- Shout – text the word ‘Shout’ to 85258


