Welcome to the DAD.Info forum: We are not open to new posts at this time
Our forum aims to provide support and guidance where it can, however we may not always have the answer. The forum is not moderated 24 hours a day, so If you – or someone you know – are being harmed or in immediate danger of being harmed, call the police on 999.
Alternatively, if you are in crisis, please call Samaritans on 116 123.
If you are worried about you or someone you know is at risk of harm, please click here: How we can help
I would appreciate some advice on the following issue please. In May 2009 my partner gave birth to our beautiful Son, our first child and he's an absolute delight. She has worked at the same company for several years and their policy had always been to top up SMP to 90% of earnings whilst on maternity leave. She informed them in writing that she was pregnant in October 2008 and that she would be taking maternity leave.
In December 2008 the company sent out an E-mail saying that due to the credit crunch, as of January 2009 they would no longer be topping up SMP as had been the policy before. As my partner was the only girl in the office that was pregnant she feels discriminated against and it has put us in a difficult financial position as when we planned the baby we were expecting to have nearly all of her salary available.
Do we have a (legal) leg to stand on?
- Samaritans – call 116 123
- Shout – text the word ‘Shout’ to 85258


