The 1st day at court went as expected.
Since CAFCASS hadn't got hold of my ex before the court date, they had to talk to her, then me (for 20 minutes), then her again. My solicitor talked to her Barrister (why she employed a barrister is anyones gues for the initial hearing). In all, it was almost 3 hours late to see the inside of the court room.
Her request to CAFCASS was that I would only see my son at a contact centre, supervised, for 60 minutes at a time, I believe every 3-4 weeks. Her reason was that our son get's stressed when he's away from his mum - mainly because he's never out of her sight & hasn't been since birth. As far as I know, the 4 hours at court was the longest she's been apart from him in 14 months.
My solicitor objected to that, since I've never been a risk to my ex or my son. Why was I being treated as such.
The CAFCASS person, did say that "CAFCASS don't recommend over-night stays with the non-resident parent until the child is 5 years old".
My heart sank.
At that point, we just tried for the best that we could do, I asked for every 3rd Sunday, for 90 minutes (unsupervised) in a contact centre preferably part way between where I live (where our son was born & the place that the ex & I lived) and where the ex decided to move to.
CAFCASS stated that it wasn't in the child's interest to travel, so I would have to do the full drive to a contact centre near the ex.
CAFCASS had the 2nd meeting with the ex to inform her of what the new plan would be, an extra 30 minutes and every 3rd week instead of once a month, unsupervised instead of my ex being in the same room. Then CAFCASS met with the judge.
It would appear that my ex objected to the new plan to the extent that the CAFCASS worker saw how unfair the ex was being. The judge ruled that I can see my son, unsupervised for 75 of the 90 minutes (with the ex present for the other 15 minutes). Since it's better for our son to be in familiar surroundings for the time, it has to be at the house where the ex & our son live. But none of her family are allowed to be at the house when I'm there.
Her barrister claimed that I'm not healthy enough to look after my son for a whole 90 minutes. (Surely I'm able to look after my son for 90 minutes, they've been quite comfortable for me to drive up to 7 hours to see my son) Even though the Specialist Stroke Consultant that had treated me had supplied a letter saying I'm perfectly capable. "That's just a G.P.'s view. I want a full health assessment". The judge saw no need.
So all in all, I thought the day went as well as it could have gone. My Solicitor and the ex's barrister were requested to agree "appropriate and suitable" visiting times.
Since I work a full week & the journey is a 320 mile round trip, Saturday & Sunday between 11:00 and 16:00 were offered by me. My ex doesn't work at all. Over a week later, and after a few unanswered calls and mails from my solicitor to her's, I was told Sunday at 10:00 - simply showing that she's still being awkward. I'll do it to see my son.