Hi guys,
The reason it was moved up was due to a number of issues and not one thing entirely, firstly the breach was so blatant and her reaction, so condescending of the law through her reaction, secondly she did me a favour by writing another letter to the court complaining about the previous decision citing male bias and systematically accused me of being abusive and dangerous, despite my profession and her previous letters from her solicitor stating I was not a danger to our son, it was very clear that the lies had simply started to trip her up. Basically so many holes in her story you could drive a car through it.
So you didn't have to submit a C2 form to get it back to court then and your letter and her letter/accusations of male bias etc was the tipping point?
.
I was just interested because some judges will bring it back when they are made aware of breaches to interim orders, some will expect a C2 application for new directions in the existing case. Hope you get the same judge at the next hearing!